Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Russell v. Smith

Russell v. Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 21, 2009
308 F. App'x 665

Counsel

Joseph M. Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Nicole Gilliam, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Russell v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Joseph M. Russell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 *666U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Russell v. Smith, No. 4:08-cv-00070-JBF-JEB (E.D.Va. Oct. 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.