U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Austin

United States v. Austin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 23, 2009
308 F. App'x 700

Counsel

Donnie J, Austin, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Austin

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Donnie Austin appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Austin, No. 3:02-cr-00124-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Aug. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.