U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Austin

United States v. Austin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 23, 2009
308 F. App'x 700

United States v. Austin

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Donnie Austin appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Austin, No. 3:02-cr-00124-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Aug. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.