U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Crihfield v. Peabody Coal Co.

Crihfield v. Peabody Coal Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 6, 2009 · Agee, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
310 F. App'x 608

Crihfield v. Peabody Coal Co.

Opinion of the Court

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leon Crihfield seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Crihfield v. Peabody Coal Co., No. 07-0670-BLA (B.R.B. May 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.