U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Womack

United States v. Womack
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 13, 2009 · Agee, Motz, Niemeyer
311 F. App'x 607

Counsel

Rayburn Womack, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Womack

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rayburn Womack appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Womack, No. 3:05-cr-00025-RLW-1 (E.D.Va. Aug. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.