Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Newton v. Washington

Newton v. Washington
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 23, 2009 · Gregory, King, Michael
311 F. App'x 652

Newton v. Washington

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jay Newton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.* Newton v. Washington, No. 1:08-cv-00599-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. June 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the *653facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

We specifically note that Newton’s claim that he is excused from administratively grieving his claims based on futility is without merit. See Booth v. Chumer, 532 U.S. 731, 741 n. 6, 121 S.Ct 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑