U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Curry v. Warden

Curry v. Warden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2009 · Agee, Duncan, Wilkinson
312 F. App'x 541

Curry v. Warden

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ralph J. Curry appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Curry v. Warden, No. 1:08-cv-00151-BEL (D. Md. filed Sept. 5, 2008 & entered Sept. 8, 2008). We deny Curry’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.