United States v. Horvath
United States v. Horvath
Opinion of the Court
• Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.'
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ritchie John Horvath, III, appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for modification of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Horvath, No. 4:05-cr-00008-FFF-6 (W.D.Va. Sept. 2, 2008; Sept. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.