U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Horvath

United States v. Horvath
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2009 · Agee, Duncan, Wilkinson
312 F. App'x 584

United States v. Horvath

Opinion of the Court

• Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.'

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ritchie John Horvath, III, appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for modification of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Horvath, No. 4:05-cr-00008-FFF-6 (W.D.Va. Sept. 2, 2008; Sept. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.