U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Norris

United States v. Norris
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 5, 2009 · Gregory, Michael, Motz
314 F. App'x 622

United States v. Norris

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Dale Norris appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Norris, No. 6:05-cr-01163-HMH-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.