U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Rashe'd v. Dillman

Rashe'd v. Dillman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 10, 2009 · Duncan, Hamilton, Niemeyer
316 F. App'x 230

Rashe'd v. Dillman

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Latif Rashe’d appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rashe’d v. Dillman, No. 7:08-cv-00333-jct-mfu, 2008 WL 2271227 (W.D.Va. June 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.