U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Baker

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 10, 2009 · Hamilton, King, Shedd

316 F. App'x 242

Counsel

Frederick Roosevelt Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Roosevelt Baker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Baker, No. 3:02-cr-00097-RLW-1 (E.D.Va. Aug. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.