U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Crosby

United States v. Crosby
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 11, 2009 · Duncan, Gregory, Michael
316 F. App'x 259

United States v. Crosby

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Fabian Anton Crosby appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Crosby, No. 3:04-cr-00250-RJC-CH-17 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.