U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Hurt v. Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

Hurt v. Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 13, 2009 · Hamilton, Niemeyer, Shedd
317 F. App'x 338

Hurt v. Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s orders dismissing these actions as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the records and find that the appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Eighth Amendment; Hurt v. The American People; Hurt v. United States; Hurt v. United States; Hurt v. Bush; Hurt v. Dedley and Singletary, Inc.; Hurt v. Clinton; Hurt v. Jim Crow, Nos. 1:08-cv-00808-LMB-TCB; 1:08-cv-00913-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-00914-LMB-TR J; 1:08-cv-00915-LMB-TCB; 1:08-ev-00916-LMB-JFA; 1:08-cv-00917-LMB-JFA; 1:08-cv-00918-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-00944-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 9, 2008, entered Sept. 11, 2008; Sept. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.