U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Dixon v. Mitchell

Dixon v. Mitchell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 17, 2009 · Hamilton, Motz, Shedd
317 F. App'x 363

Dixon v. Mitchell

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert H. Dixon appeals the district court’s order denying him leave to file an amended complaint after the action had already been dismissed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dixon v. Mitchell, No. 1:08-cv-00473-GCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.