U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Hughes

United States v. Hughes
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 16, 2009
318 F. App'x 162

Counsel

Kenneth Bronson Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Hughes

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Bronson Hughes appeals the district court’s order granting relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and its order denying relief on Hughes’ subsequently filed § 3582(c)(2) motion. We find no reversible error and we thus affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hughes, No. 6:02-cr-70105-nkm-2 (W.D.Va. Sept. 2 & 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.