U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Gantt

United States v. Gantt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 16, 2009
318 F. App'x 163

Counsel

George Billy Lee Gantt, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Gantt

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

George Billy Lee Gantt appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gantt, No. 8:04-er-01013-HFF-1 (D.S.C. Sept. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.