U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Miller v. Cunningham

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 18, 2009

318 F. App'x 186

Counsel

Patrick M. McSweeney, Wesley G. Russell, Jr., McSweeney, Crump, Childress & Temple, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Kenneth T. Cuceinelli, II, Paul A. Prados, Cuc-cinelli & Day, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellants. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General, Stephen R. McCullough, State Solicitor General, James V. Ingold, Senior Assistant Attorney General, William C. Mims, Chief Deputy Attorney General, William E. Thro, Special Counsel to the Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Larry Miller and the 11th Senatorial District Republican Committee appeal the district court’s order denying their 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) (2000) motion for attorneys’ fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Cunningham, 564 F.Supp.2d 555 (2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.