U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Robinson

United States v. Robinson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 25, 2009 · Niemeyer, Shedd, Wilkinson
319 F. App'x 275

United States v. Robinson

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Demetrius Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Robinson, No. 6:02-cr-70098-nkm-1 (W.D.Va. May 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and *276legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.