U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Queen

United States v. Queen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 23, 2009 · Agee, King, Traxler
319 F. App'x 303

United States v. Queen

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Queen, No. 1:93-cr-00369-AMD-1 (D. Md. filed Sept. 19 & entered Sept. 22, 2008; filed Oct. 1 & entered Oct. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.