U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Cooper v. Hamidullah

Cooper v. Hamidullah
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 6, 2009 · Duncan, Motz, Wilkinson
320 F. App'x 170

Cooper v. Hamidullah

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Cooper appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See Cooper v. Hamidullah, No. 4:07-cv-00113-TLW, 2008 WL 906704 (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.