U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Boysaw v. Friedman

Boysaw v. Friedman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 6, 2009 · Gregory, Hamilton, Shedd
320 F. App'x 178

Boysaw v. Friedman

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald M. Boysaw appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boysaw v. Friedman, No. 1:07-cv-00079-jpj-pms, 2008 WL 4452650 (W.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.