U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Thomas

United States v. Thomas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 9, 2009 · Hamilton, Michael, Wilkinson
321 F. App'x 278

Counsel

Jerrell Antonio Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Thomas

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerrell Antonio Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. 2:94-cr-00069-RGD-3 (E.D.Va. Jan. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.