U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Graham

United States v. Graham
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 31, 2009 · Duncan, Motz, Niemeyer
321 F. App'x 322

United States v. Graham

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Marcel Graham appeals the district court’s order partially granting Graham’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Graham, No. 3:99-cr-00137-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 8, 2008). We deny Graham’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.