U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Roe

United States v. Roe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 15, 2009 · Gregory, Hamilton, Shedd
322 F. App'x 290

United States v. Roe

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Preston Darnell Roe appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to unseal the presentence report of another defendant in a closed criminal case. We have reviewed the record included on appeal as well as the parties’ briefs, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States Dep’t of Justice v. Julian, 486 U.S. 1, 12, 108 S.Ct. 1606, 100 L.Ed.2d 1 (1988) (holding that a third party must make a showing of a “special need” in order to gain access to another individual’s presentence report). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.