U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Sampson v. City of Cambridge

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 16, 2009 · Agee, Traxler, Wilkinson

322 F. App'x 295

Counsel

R. Scott Oswald, Adam Augustine Carter, Gregory Sharma-Holt, The Employment Law Group, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Kevin Karpinski, Victoria M. Shearer, Karpinski, Colaresi & Karp, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Taylor v. Rite Aid Corp. (District Court, D. Maryland 2014)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ina Sampson appeals the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sampson v. City of Cambridge, No. l:06-cv-01819-WDQ (D. Md. June 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.