U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Holmes v. United States

Holmes v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 22, 2009 · Niemeyer, Shedd, Wilkinson
322 F. App'x 323

Holmes v. United States

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald J. Holmes appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Holmes, 586 F.Supp.2d 584 (D.S.C. 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *324in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.