U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

McNeill v. Stamper

McNeill v. Stamper
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 27, 2009 · Niemeyer, Shedd, Wilkinson
323 F. App'x 255

McNeill v. Stamper

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael McNeill appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeill v. Stamper, No. 3:08-cv-00162-GCM (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2009). We deny McNeill’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.