U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Clements

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 23, 2009 · Niemeyer, Shedd, Wilkinson

323 F. App'x 284

Counsel

John William Clements, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John William Clements appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Clements, No. 2:99-cr-00198-4 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 20, 2008); see also United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 252-56 (4th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed,, Mar. 20, 2009 (No. 08-1185). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.