U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 1, 2009 · Duncan, Gregory, Michael
324 F. App'x 206

Counsel

Michael R. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se., Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Jackson

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael R. Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find'no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Jackson, No. 3:93-cr-00125-RLW-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 8, 2008). We deny Jackson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the *207facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.