Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Michael R. Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find'no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Jackson, No. 3:93-cr-00125-RLW-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 8, 2008). We deny Jackson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the *207facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.