Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Pigford

United States v. Pigford
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 5, 2009
325 F. App'x 157

Counsel

Jerome Pigford, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Pigford

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Pigford appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pigford, No. 7:00-cr-00133-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.