United States v. Bridges
United States v. Bridges
325 F. App'x 241
United States v. Bridges
Opinion of the Court
Jason F. Bridges appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bridges, No. 1:05-cr-00080-IMK-JSK-1 (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 15, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.