U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Scott

United States v. Scott
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 2009
325 F. App'x 248

Counsel

James Alexander Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Scott

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

James Alexander Scott appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Scott, No. 1:99-cr-00405-1 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 5, 2009 & entered Jan. 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma*249terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.