U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Noble

United States v. Noble
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 2009
325 F. App'x 249

Counsel

Gerald Noble, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Noble

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Noble appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Noble, No. 3:95-cr-00488-JFA-5 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.