Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Odom v. Ozmint

Odom v. Ozmint
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 2009
325 F. App'x 254

Counsel

Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Mary Farrell, John Eric Kaufmann, Donald Ray Settana, Jr., McKay, Cauthen, Settana & Stubley, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Odom v. Ozmint

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order accepting the recom*255mendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. Ozmint, No. 3:07-cv-00343-PMD (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.