U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. McGaha

United States v. McGaha
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 1, 2009 · Agee, Motz, Traxler
326 F. App'x 134

Counsel

Kenneth Dewayne McGaha, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. McGaha

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Dewayne McGaha appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McGaha, No. 8:06-cr-01187-HFF-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.