United States v. Privott
United States v. Privott
326 F. App'x 137
United States v. Privott
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Andrew Lewis Privott appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(a) motion to correct purported errors in his presentence investigation report (“PSR”). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Privott, No. 2:02-cr-00090-JBF-FBS-1 (E.D.Va. Feb. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.