U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Parker

United States v. Parker
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 4, 2009 · Gregory, King, Wilkinson
326 F. App'x 153

Counsel

Demond O’Neil Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giomo, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Parker

Opinion of the Court

*154Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Demond O’Neil Parker appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Parker’s motions to: vacate the district court’s order, appoint counsel, and remand the case, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Parker, No. 6:99-cr-70054-nkm-9 (W.D.Va. Oct. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.