U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Hoey

United States v. Hoey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 2009 · Gregory, King, Wilkinson
326 F. App'x 165

United States v. Hoey

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony Hoey appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hoey, No.4:96-cr-00053-LHT-13 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.