U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Vanover v. Shams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 2009 · Gregory, King, Wilkinson

326 F. App'x 166

Counsel

Jilla N. Vanover, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Todd Freeman, Samuel I. White, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Ronald James Guillot, Jr., Samuel I. White, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Jonathan S. Cohen, Christine Durney Mason, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Robert K. Coulter, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jilla N. Vanover appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. *167§ 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1916(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vanover v. Shams, No. 1:08-cv-01037-LMBIDD (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 23, 2008 & entered Oct. 23, 2008; Oct. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argu-. ment would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.