U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Burdick v. Pritchett & Birch, PLLC

Burdick v. Pritchett & Birch, PLLC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 2009 · Gregory, King, Wilkinson
326 F. App'x 169

Counsel

George E. Burdick, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Graham Baker, Baker, Jenkins, Jones & Daly, PA, Ahoskie, North Carolina, Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Burdick v. Pritchett & Birch, PLLC

Opinion of the Court

*170Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George E. Burdick appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burdick v. Pritchett & Birch, PLLC, No.4:08-cv-00053-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2008; Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.