U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Billups

United States v. Billups
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 8, 2009 · Duncan, King, Wilkinson
326 F. App'x 249

Counsel

Gregory L. Billups, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Billups

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory L. Billups appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Billups, No. 3:05-cr-00042-RLW-l (E.D.Va. Aug. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.