U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Hudson

United States v. Hudson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 8, 2009 · Duncan, Gregory, Niemeyer
326 F. App'x 250

United States v. Hudson

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Charles Hudson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hudson, No. 6:98-cr-00930-MBS-1 (D.S.C. July 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.