U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Rice

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 17, 2009 · King, Michael, Shedd

326 F. App'x 691

Counsel

Ronald Eugene Rice, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Eugene Rice appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for reconsideration of an order finding him ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Rice, No. 7:90-cr-00310-GRA-9, 2009 WL 51321 (D.S.C. Jan. 8, 2009). We dispense with *692oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.