U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Chase

United States v. Chase
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 24, 2009
327 F. App'x 400

Counsel

Emilio Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Chase

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Emilio Chase appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chase, No. 3:04-cr-00042-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.