U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Sims

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 27, 2009 · Niemeyer, Shedd, Wilkinson

328 F. App'x 213

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Sims appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sims, No. 7:02-cr-00248-GRA-13, 2009 WL 24233 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2009).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

We consider Sims’ notice of appeal to have been timely filed. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.