United States v. Bassett
United States v. Bassett
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Clarence Bassett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a judicial inquiry and seeking an evidentiary hearing on the Government’s refusal to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bassett, No. 4:03-cr-00069-RGD-TEM-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.