U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Goode

United States v. Goode
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 30, 2009 · Michael, Shedd, Traxler
328 F. App'x 230

Counsel

Preston T. Goode, Appellant Pro Se. Rodney LaMont Jefferson, Office of the United States Attorney, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Goode

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Preston T. Goode appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Goode’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Goode, No. 3:00-cr-00223-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Jan. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.