U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Coles v. Everett

Coles v. Everett
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 30, 2009 · Michael, Shedd, Traxler
328 F. App'x 232

Counsel

Corey Coles, Appellant Pro Se.

Coles v. Everett

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Corey Coles appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice Coles’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coles v. Everett, No. 2:08-cv-00493-RGD-FBS (E.D.Va. Jan. 23, 2009). We deny Coles’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *233in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.