U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Langley

United States v. Langley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 2009 · Michael, Shedd, Traxler
328 F. App'x 265

United States v. Langley

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth O. Langley appeals the district court’s order granting Langley’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Langley, No. 4:04-cr-00073-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2008). We deny Langley’s motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.