U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Moore

United States v. Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 7, 2009 · Shedd, Traxler, Wilkinson
328 F. App'x 280

United States v. Moore

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Leon Moore appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Moore, No. 7:01-Cr-00083-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2009). The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.